 |
Artists & Works
|
|
|
Joseph Piccillo
American (b. 1941)
EDGE EVENT XVIII (1981)
graphite on canvas
60" x 72"
|
 |
|
STYLE: Neo-expressionism
|
©Joseph Piccillo |
|
Although artists often claim a deeper meaning for their imagery
than its visual characteristics alone, Joseph Piccillo insists upon
this more emphatically than most. "My work has nothing to do with
art," he says. The horses in Edge Event XVIII are drawn on
a large scale, selectively and mysteriously framed. They are disturbing
images. They rear aggressively against the canvas, but are ruthlessly
chopped off at various points. Their bodies seem deliberately ghostly
against Piccillo's frequently used device of a black background.
Although the central divider separates them, the fact that they
face in opposite directions suggest a common sourceas if they
are two different aspects of the same figure. The grace and violence
of this work keeps the viewer gazing. Although the horses are ominous
on one hand, their beauty is equally compelling.
Joseph Piccillo has been exhibiting his work for thirty years in
New York, across the United States, and throughout Europe. His work
can be found in numerous public and private collections such as
IBM, Microsoft, Time, Inc., Dow-Jones, the Albright-Knox Art Gallery,
the Brooklyn Museum, and the Museum of Modern Art. Piccillo lives,
paints, and teaches in Buffalo, N.Y.
|
CRITICAL EXCERPTS
|
|
Linda Cathcart, Joseph Piccillo: The Birth of an Image, Burchfield-Penney
Art Center exhibition, 12/87
"Piccillo's paintings and works on paper, from the end of the 1970s
and through the 1980s, come from the realm of figuration. His intent
lies somewhere between Andy Warhol's stark, isolated images juxtaposed
against single violent background colors, and paintings by artists
like Robert Longo, whose works have an edge of emotion which provides
a delicate shift from the possibly pedantic narrative interest in
figuration, towards an irony and grittiness which reinforce their
emotional purpose...His ambition is to create pictures in which
the human or animal image is presented in mythic proportions. Piccillo
likes to think of himself as a commentator on our timesan
intellectual cynic in a society which makes "heroes and heroines
of Oliver North and Vanna White," as Piccillo puts it. However,
he is also reluctant to preach, so what is important to Piccillo's
work is his desire to capture in impact the heroic figure...in
a stark style both spare and baroquehe renders, on canvas
or paper, juxtaposed anonymous images (landscapes, figures, heads,
horses) which when taken together posit the absurd with the sublime.
These pictures are not earthbound; ordinary characters do not people
them...Piccillo is not a "realist" painternone are there to
remind us that they exist in the real world; nor is he a pop artist...Piccillo
says he does not want to inflict his aesthetic on the viewer, but
instead chooses his subjects because they are "risky" to make and
push his abilities. His compositions are determined by his desire
to work dissonance against simplicity...The paintings can be similar
or can contain multiple but isolated figuresdivorced by each
other by a strict unseen grid...In some of his pictures Piccillo
overlays the images with a geometry of lines and small colored shapes...This
system of lines and shapes is not related to the original or "underneath"
grid...Piccillo uses this device in two ways. One, as a sort of
blackboard of his own personal making, or secondly, as a perverse
disruption of what might otherwise be a too perfect picture...The
meticulous draftsmanship and the stark images whose shadows blend
with a background black as a void are breathtaking...Despite the
separate images, the picture is never static...For example in Edge
Event XVII, 1981, two horses separated on the canvas by a central
bar are seen in part and in opposition. One turns right, the other
left. It appears as though their forebodies were born from a single
explosion beyond the viewer's vantage point...
For the viewers the first concern is not now Piccillo's technique,
but rather the pathos, the silent violence and beauty of the figures.
They are mean and womenanimals engaged in silent battle, each
in a struggle for its own beauty...artists from Leonardo to Gericault,
Degas and Delacroix, depicted horses as well as humans because 'either
the grace or the violence of these animals so many times changed
the course of human history. The horse as supreme beast as well
as mythological and historical symbol can come, in Piccillo's work,
to be a "kaleidoscope" of expressions: terrorized, sexual, aggressive,
docile, suffering.'[Charlotta Kotik]" Reagan Upshaw, Art in America,
2/81 "One is first struck by the rampant romanticism of the subject:
giant white horses, like something out of Delecroix or Gericault,
rear or roll within the cramped confines of the pictures' space....There
is a suggestion of the horses as actors in a story going on outside
the limits of the frame, but we are nowhere told what the story
is. These drawings, whether on canvas or on paper, evince the draftsmanship
which first brought Picillo to attention. The horses are rendered
in an anatomically precise manner, but, as in Chuck Close's work,
the scale nullifies the illusionism."
|
J.P. quote, Buffalo
News, 12/8/81
"My work has nothing to do with 'art.' Sometimes I don't even
think of myself as an 'artist.' I make pictures...My work is about
meaning and thinking...I decided to use animal imagery instead of
always relying on the human figure...I didn't want the images to be
too recognizable. I want them to be universal...Exclusively pencil
on canvas is a unique thing. That came about by not being interested
in painting."
|
Reagan Upshaw, Art
in America, 2/81
"One is first struck by the rampant romanticism of the subject: giant
white horses, like something out of Delecroix or Gericault, rear or
roll within the cramped confines of the pictures' space....There is
a suggestion of the horses as actors in a story going on outside the
limits of the frame, but we are nowhere told what the story is. These
drawings, whether on canvas or on paper, evince the draftsmanship
which first brought Piccillo to attention. The horses are rendered
in an anatomically precise manner, but, as in Chuck Close's work,
the scale nullifies the illusionism."
|
Diane Cochran, American
Artist, 12/73
"[JP quote:] 'I am very much affected by the political scene.
I can't just read and remain calm. I must express myself somehow.
But good art cannot be editorial..." Piccillo sees the horror in man's
inhumanity and tries to express it visually. "...my work is more McLuhanesque.
I give the viewer lots of information or impulses. Some people will
recognize and respond to them; others won't.'
Piccillo's figures are singularly inhumane in a very human way. But
they are nobody we know personally, or admit to know. They are symbols,
illusions, rather than particular people...For all his technical competence,
Piccillo believes that art is 90 percent intellectual effort and only
10 percent skill." |
|
|