|
|
Born in Barcelona, Joan Miro studied there as well, his art training
interupted briefly by an abortive career as a businessman. In 1920,
Miro made his first trip to Paris where he met Picasso; in 1923,
he joined the Surrealist group. Miro created his own Surrealistic
language, using elements of Cubism as well as attempting to tap
into unconscious sources of creativity, but never losing touch with
the real world. One of the best-known and loved artists of the Modernish
era, Miro has had major retrospectives at the Museum of Modern Art
and the Guggenheim; there is a Miro Foundation in Barcelona.
Miro started his experiments in lithography in 1929, and made prints
throughout his career, as well as paintings, sculpture, collages,
and ceramics. Joan Prats was an art dealer in Barcelona and great
friend and patron of Miro.Prats was instrumental in helping Miro
publish some of his most significant printmaking projects, including
collaborations with poets, such as Joan Brossa, another close friend.
|
CRITICAL EXCERPTS
|
|
Robert Lubar, Art in America, 9/94
" This emphasis on Miro's formal purity in American art criticism
has, however, eclipsed the more anarchic and rebellious aspects
of his artistic personality. In a 1931 interview, Miro insisted:
The only thing that's clear to me is that I intend to destroy,
destroy everything that exists in painting. I have an utter contempt
for painting. The only thing that interests me is the spirit itself,
and I only use the customary artist's tools--brushes, canvas, paints--in
order to get the best results." This was not a gratuitous remark,
occasioned by Miro's then-recent work in collage and his experimentation
with object-sculptures. For Miro reacted against esthetic purity
as an end in itself throughout his long career. His art is as much
a matter of anti-painting--a kind of anti-style and challenge to
painting--as it demonstrates, in Sweeney's words, a "fundamental
devotion to painting. What is more, the language Miro repeatedly
invoked to describe his work--aggression, violence, terror, revolt
and assassination--indicates that there was a social and moral project
at the core of his art: Miro's challenge to pure form was from the
start an act of protest against the reified consciousness of bourgeois
society."
|
Louise Bourgeouise,
Artforum,1/94
Miro was a true naive, trusting, unable to take two steps without
his supporting family. When I knew him he always replied to every
question, I'll have to ask Pilar, his wife. His large
brown eyes were innocent and serene. He was a truly naive person in
the best sense of the word: someone who could not grow up. He was
what he was and did not pretend or want to be anybody else. He believed
in himself, and that is a great compliment. He really accepted himself.
In the true naive there is no discrepancy between the person and the
work. Miro was his work." |
|
|